The carbon footprint of electricity is 461.1 kg CO2e per Megawatt-Hour (MWh) for the world average electricity generation in 2019. Consumer Ecology estimates global electricity emissions to be 12,470 Million Metric Tonnes (MMT) CO2e in 2019, which represents 37.3% of global CO2 emissions from energy (IEA, 2022A).

Since 1990, the carbon intensity of electricity decreased by 31.9 kg CO2e / MWh, which is a 6.6% decrease. However, global emissions have increased from 5,874 MMT CO2e in 1990 to 12,740 MMT CO2e in 2019, which is more than double the annual emissions in 1990.

The carbon footprint of electricity varies by the generation source. Coal power generates the highest emissions at 863 kg CO2e / MWh, while tidal power generates the lowest, at 8.0 kg CO2e / MWh. Even renewable energy still generates CO2 emissions due to mining, manufacturing, construction, maintenance, and end of life disposal, however tidal power emits only 0.93% as much CO2 as coal power. See the below chart for a comparison of the carbon intensity of different sources of electricity.

What is the Carbon Footprint of Electricity Around the World?

Consumer Ecology analyzed the carbon footprint of electricity in the top 50 energy using countries in the world, the full list is available at the end of this page. One way of looking at the carbon footprint of electricity is to measure carbon intensity, or how much CO2 is generated per unit of power. To put it another way, how much CO2 will I emit if I use 1 megawatt-hour of electricity in any given country? The average US household uses about 10.7 megawatt-hours each year (EIA, 2021). Carbon intensity is a great way to measure how well a country is doing at decarbonizing its electricity.

Paraguay earns the award for the lowest carbon electricity, which comes from nearly 100% hydro power. Among the top 5 countries with the lowest carbon intensity of electricity, 4 of the 5 countries are considered Developed Economies by the United Nations (2020), while the 4 of the 5 of the highest carbon intensity countries are considered Developing Economies, and are highly dependent on coal power. If you use electricity in Paraguay compared to South Africa, the highest carbon intensity country, you will generate only 2.7% as much carbon compared to South Africa.

The second way of looking at the carbon footprint of electricity is to measure total carbon emissions, or how much CO2 is generated from all of a country’s electricity generation, which is the most impactful measure of how much a country contributes to climate change. When we take this perspective, the picture changes quite a bit. Now we see that China is the largest electricity emitter, with 4,506.2 Million Metric Tonnes (MMT) CO2e in 2020, which is 36.1% of all electricity emissions in 2019 (note, 2020 world data is not yet available as of June, 2022). Because China emits over a third of global electricity emissions, its emissions equal nearly as much as the next 8 countries in the below graph. In fact, the top 10 countries emitted 73.7% of all 2019 emissions from electricity. The next 40 countries only emit an additional 10.7% of 2019 emissions.

Which Countries Decreased Their Electricity Emissions the Most Since 1990?

Emissions decreases can be viewed from an electricity intensity perspective, as well as from a total emissions decrease perspective. Among the top 50 highest energy using countries, the top 10 countries who lowered their electricity emission intensity are as follows:

  1. 67.7% – United Kingdom
  2. 58.4% – Portugal
  3. 58.3% – Finland
  4. 56.9% – Romania
  5. 56.3% – Ireland
  6. 51.7% – Spain
  7. 51.6% – Greece
  8. 49.5% – Italy
  9. 49.1% – Austria
  10. 43.6% – Ukraine
The award for the most improved carbon intensity of electricity goes to the United Kingdom, who lowered their emissions by 67.7% since 1990. In the United Kingdom, using electricity now generates 67.7% less CO2 than it did in 1990. Each of the top 10 countries have all excelled at decarbonizing their electricity, particularly as compared to the world average electricity carbon intensity, which decreased only by 6.6% over the same period of time.
Countries can also be ranked according to their total achieved decrease in emissions, which has the largest effect on climate change. The top 10 countries who lowered their total emissions from electricity are as follows:
  1. 174.8 MMT CO2e – United States
  2. 144.2 MMT CO2e – United Kingdom
  3. 120.1 MMT CO2e – Ukraine
  4. 119.6 MMT CO2e – Germany
  5. 105.4 MMT CO2e – Russia
  6.   47.3 MMT CO2e – Italy
  7.   23.2 MMT CO2e – Romania
  8.   20.7 MMT CO2e – Canada
  9.   11.2 MMT CO2e – France
  10.   10.2 MMT CO2e – Spain
The award for the greatest carbon reduction from electricity goes to the United States, but the United Kingdom follows in close second! Do you notice anything strange about the #10 spot? By the time we reach the #23 spot, emissions stop decreasing, and in fact start increasing since 1990. While the carbon intensity of electricity emissions decreased in 39 out of the 49 countries (1990 data missing for Laos), conversely total electric use only decreased in 6 out of 49 countries. This is mostly because of population growth and because of the industrialization of countries, in particular China, who use more electricity as they work towards becoming developed nations. Total electricity in the top 49 countries increased from 10,895 Terawatt-Hours (TWh) in 1990 to 23,947 TWh in 2020, which is more than twice as much electricity.

Which Countries Have the Highest per Capita Emissions From Electricity?

Per Capita emissions are emissions per person in a country. Per Capita emissions are a useful measure because they help us understand if a country is emitting a lot because it uses too much electricity, or because it has a lot of people that need electricity. The top 10 countries with the highest per Capita emissions are listed as follows:

  1. 6.80 MT CO2e / person – Taiwan
  2. 6.13 MT CO2e / person – Australia
  3. 5.39 MT CO2e / person – South Korea
  4. 4.85 MT CO2e / person – United States
  5. 4.49 MT CO2e / person – Singapore
  6. 4.47 MT CO2e / person – Israel
  7. 4.11 MT CO2e / person – Japan
  8. 3.40 MT CO2e / person – Serbia
  9. 3.25 MT CO2e / person – China
  10. 3.07 MT CO2e / person – South Africa
The world per capita emissions from electricity are 1.61 MT CO2e / person, which means that each of the top 10 countries emit almost twice as much CO2 per person compared with the world average. With the exception of Singapore and the United States, each of the top 10 countries relied on high emitting coal for at least 30% of its electricity generation. While China and India have nearly the same populations, China (3.25 MT CO2e / person) emits 4.3 times as much carbon per person as India (0.76 MT CO2e / person)! Low per Capita emissions can also tell us how well a country is doing at decarbonizing its electricity, but they can also tell us when a country is supplying relatively little electricity to its population, for example in India. Many developing countries have low per Capita emissions not because they are climate heroes, but because many people have little to no access to electricity at all. This is one of the greatest challenges of sustainable development, to make sure that the world can develop without increasing carbon emissions, and so far, we haven’t done a great job.

How Much of the World's Electricity Comes From Renewable Energy?

In 2019, the world generated 26.6% (7,198 Terawatt-Hours: TWh) of its energy from renewable energy, 10.3% (2,790 TWh) from nuclear, and 63.1% (17,056 TWh) from fossil fuels, the majority from coal power (9,914 TWh). China is the world’s leading renewable energy user, with 2,200 TWh of renewable energy generation, which is slightly more than the next 4 highest countries’ renewable energy generation (United States, Brazil, Canada, India). However, despite the large amount of renewable energy generation in China, the country generates 28.2% of its electricity from renewable sources, and still has a higher electricity emission intensity than the world average, due to its high use of coal power.

Which countries use the most renewable energy?

Among the top 50 energy using countries in the world, the top 10 countries who used the most renewable energy as a percentage of total electricity in 2020 are listed as follows:

  1.  100% – Paraguay
  2. 98.7% – Norway
  3. 84.5% – Brazil
  4. 82.0% – Austria
  5. 80.6% – New Zealand
  6. 79.9% – Ecuador
  7. 71.5% – Laos
  8. 70.7% – Colombia
  9. 68.5% – Sweden
  10. 67.9% – Canada
Which countries use the most wind energy?
Among the top 50 energy using countries in the world, the top 10 countries who used the most wind energy as a percentage of total electricity in 2020 are listed as follows:
  1. 35.8% – Ireland
  2. 24.2% – United Kingdom
  3. 22.8% – Portugal
  4. 22.5% – Germany
  5. 21.5% – Spain
  6. 20.1% – Greece
  7. 16.9% – Sweden
  8. 14.5% – Belgium
  9. 12.5% – Netherlands
  10. 12.4% – Romania
Which countries use the most solar energy?
Among the top 50 energy using countries in the world, the top 10 countries who used the most solar energy as a percentage of total electricity in 2020 are listed as follows:
  1. 9.4% – Greece
  2. 9.3% – Chile
  3. 8.9% – Italy
  4. 8.7% – Germany
  5. 7.9% – Australia
  6. 7.8% – Spain
  7. 7.6% – Japan
  8. 7.0% – Hungary
  9. 6.5% – Netherlands
  10. 5.6% – Belgium
Which countries use the most hydroelectric energy?
Among the top 50 energy using countries in the world, the top 10 countries who used the most hydroelectric energy as a percentage of total electricity in 2020 are listed as follows:
  1.  100% – Paraguay
  2. 92.0% – Norway
  3. 78.0% – Ecuador
  4. 71.4% – Laos
  5. 69.3% – Colombia
  6. 63.8% – Brazil
  7. 62.5% – Austria
  8. 60.0% – Canada
  9. 57.7% – Peru
  10. 57.3% – Switzerland

Carbon Footprint of Electricity Data Set

Primary data is supplied by the International Energy Agency (2022B) with additional modeling by Consumer Ecology, as described in the Data and Assumptions Section below.

CountryGeneration Rank2020 Generation (GWh)1990 Generation (GWh)2020 Emission Intensity (kg CO2e / MWh)1990 Emission Intensity (kg CO2e / MWh)% Change in Emission Intensity2020 Emissions (MMT CO2e)1990 Emissions (MMT CO2e)2020 Change in Emissions (MMT CO2e)% Change in Total EmissionsPer Capita Emissions (MT CO2e / Person)
United States24,247,6743,218,621378.3553.5-31.7%1,606.81,781.5-174.8-9.81%4.85
South Korea8586,330105,371476.8347.037.4%279.636.6243.0664.59%5.39
United Kingdom13312,759319,737212.9659.2-67.7%66.6210.8-144.2-68.41%0.99
South Africa20239,458167,226759.5805.7-5.7%181.9134.747.134.99%3.07
Czech Republic3081,44362,559398.9670.0-40.5%32.541.9-9.4-22.49%3.04
New Zealand4245,16932,265134.0122.29.7%

Data and Assumptions

  • The Carbon Footprint of all energy sources except for Solar is based on NREL (2021), which uses cradle to grave emissions factors. The share of energy sources is based on the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2022B) with 2020 data. See the table below for individual source emission values and weights.
    • The value for “Supercritical Pulverized Coal” in NREL (2021) is assumed for “Coal” in the IEA Database.
    • The average value for “Natural Gas” of all technologies from NREL (2021) is assumed for “Natural Gas” in the IEA Database.
    • The value for “Oil” in NREL (2021) is used for “Oil” in the IEA Database.
    • The value for “Light Water Reactors” in NREL (2021) is used for “Nuclear” in the IEA Database.
    • The average value for “Wind” for all technologies in NREL (2021) is used for “Wind” in the IEA Database.
    • The average value for “Hydropower” for all technologies in NREL (2021) is used for “Hydro” in the IEA Database.
    • The average value for “Biopower” in NREL (2021) is assumed for “Biofuels” in the IEA Database.
    • The average value for “Geothermal” for all technologies in NREL (2021) is used for “Geothermal” in the IEA Database.
    • The average value for “Concentrating Solar Power” in NREL (2021) is used for “Solar Thermal” in the IEA Database. Value is not adjusted for average solar radiation of each country because a reference solar radiation value is not given.
    • The value for “Waste” in the IEA Database is based on Pfadt-Trilling et al. (2021), who performed a lifecycle of waste, including diverted waste streams from energy recovery, or Waste-to-Energy. The study found a net emission of 0.0824 kg CO2e / kWh, or 82.4 kg CO2e / MWh, which is used for the emission factor or waste energy. Value does not include methane recovery.
    • The value for “Ocean” in NREL (2021) is used for “Tide” in the IEA Database.
    • The weighted average value for all energy sources is used for “Other Sources” in the IEA Database. These sources primarily include energy recovery and purchases of waste heat from other industrial processes. “Other Sources” only made up 0.18% of world energy generation in 2019.
    • See the “Further Resources” Section below for individual assumptions made for each additional fuel source.
  • The carbon footprint of solar PV is based on the harmonized value of 25 g CO2e / kWh for monocrystalline solar PV reported by Louwen et al. (2016). Original value is based on Wetzel & Borchers (2015).
    • Solar radiation value is based on the Global Solar Atlas (2022) Global Horizontal Irradiation average for all of all land below 60 degrees latitude. Average raster file value was obtained using QGIS (2022). Note this value is likely an underestimation of installed solar capacity, as solar is more likely to be installed in areas with higher solar radiation.
    • Solar radiation based on the average of each country’s total solar resource by land area. For countries with land above 60 degrees latitude, only the portion of land below 60 degrees was averaged.
    • No data is available for Finland because of its latitude. The value for Sweden is used as a proxy for Finland.
    • Value adjusted to 24.7 g CO2e / kWh to adjust for 1,700 kWh / m2 / yr solar radiation reference value used in Wetzel & Borchers (2015).
    • For further details see the Solar Panels Carbon Footprint & Environmental Impact Page.
  • Population listed for per Capita emissions is from the World Bank (2020), with the exception of Taiwan. The population of Taiwan is subtracted from the population of China, based on World Meters (2022). While Taiwan is not officially a country, it is treated as a country for these purposes.

World Average Electricity Carbon Footprint (2019):

Fuel Source% of Grid ElectricitySource Emissions (kg CO2e / MWh)Weighted Emissions (kg CO2e / MWh)
Natural Gas23.5%486.0114.04
Solar PV2.5%24.70.62
Solar Thermal0.0%28.00.01
Other Unknown Fuels0.2%461.10.83
Further Resources:


EIA: US Energy Information Administration. (2021). How Much Electricity Does an American Home Use?. See Link to Source

EIA: US Energy Information Administration. (August 15, 2016). Shale gas production drives world natural gas production growth. See Link to Source

Global Energy Monitor. (January, 2022). Global Coal Mine Tracker – Summary Tables – Summary Table 12 – Coal Production By Mine Type (Surface, Underground). See Link to Source

Global Solar Atlas. (2022). World Global Horizontal Irradiation. See Link to Source

IEA: International Energy Agency. (2022A). Global Energy Review 2021 – CO2 Emissions. See Link to Source

IEA: International Energy Agency. (2022B). Electricity – Electricity Generation by Source. See Link to Source

Louwen, A., Van Sark, W. G., Faaij, A. P., & Schropp, R. E. (2016). Re-assessment of net energy production and greenhouse gas emissions avoidance after 40 years of photovoltaics development. Nature Communications, 7(1), 1-9.

NREL: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2021). Life Cycle Assessment Harmonization. See Link to Source

Pfadt-Trilling, A. R., Volk, T. A., & Fortier, M. O. P. (2021). Climate change impacts of electricity generated at a waste-to-energy facility. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(3), 1436-1445., 2022. QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. See Link to Source

United Nations. (2020). World Economic Situation and Prospects 2020. See Link to Source
Van de Ven, D. J., Capellan-Peréz, I., Arto, I., Cazcarro, I., de Castro, C., Patel, P., & Gonzalez-Eguino, M. (2021). The potential land requirements and related land use change emissions of solar energy. Scientific reports, 11(1), 1-12.
Wetzel, T., & Borchers, S. (2015). Update of energy payback time and greenhouse gas emission data for crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 23(10), 1429-1435.

World Bank. (2022). Population, total. See Link to Source

World Meters. (2022). Taiwan Population. See Link to Source